Opinion
Cr.S. 10-0229-WBS
08-04-2011
DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JORGE GUILLEN Benjamin Galloway for CLEMENTE JIMENEZ Attorney for Defendant JOSE BRAVO BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424
Federal Defender
BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
JORGE GUILLEN
STIPULATION AND ORDER
JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb
It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, JORGE GUILLEN by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, and JOSE BRAVO, by and through his attorney, CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, that the status conference set for Monday, August 8, 2011, be continued to Monday, September 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m..
The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.
Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for September 26, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL J. BRODERICK
Federal Defender
BENJAMIN GALLOWAY
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
JORGE GUILLEN
Respectfully submitted,
Benjamin Galloway for
CLEMENTE JIMENEZ
Attorney for Defendant
JOSE BRAVO
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
Benjamin Galloway for
JASON HITT
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER
IT HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to September 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., for Further Status Conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from the date of this order August 3, 2011 up to and including September 26, 2011, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE