From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Guido

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 26, 2022
S7 20 Cr. 163 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2022)

Opinion

S7 20 Cr. 163 (PKC)

05-26-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS GUIDO, III Defendant

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York SARAH MORTAZAVI ANDEN CHOW Assistant United States Attorneys Thomas Guido III Joseph Corozzo Esq., Attorney for defendant


DAMIAN WILLIAMS

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

SARAH MORTAZAVI

ANDEN CHOW

Assistant United States Attorneys

Thomas Guido III

Joseph Corozzo Esq.,

Attorney for defendant

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE KEVIN CASTEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about May 25, 2022, THOMAS GUIDO, III (the "defendant") was charged in a one-count Superseding Information (the "Information"), with misbranding and adulteration of drugs in interstate commerce, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 331 and 333;

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Sections 334, of any and all drugs that were adulterated or misbranded when introduced into or while in interstate commerce or while held for sale (whether or not the first sale) after shipment in interstate commerce, or which may not, under the provisions of section 331(11), 344, or 355 of this title, have been introduced mto interstate commerce, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the value of such Property (the "Forfeitable Property");

WHEREAS, on or about May 25, 2022, the defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Sections 334 and 853, and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), a sum of money equal to $61,800.97 in United States currency representing the value of the Forfeitable Property (the "Money Judgement");

WHEREAS, the defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the defendant, the Forfeitable Property cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

WHEREAS, the defendant consents to the entry of the Money Judgment in the amount of $61,800.97 in United States currency representing the value of Forfeitable Property, which shall be remitted to the United States pursuant to the schedule set forth below;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney DAMIAN WILLIAMS, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorneys Sarah Mortazavi and Anden Chow, of counsel, and the defendant, and his counsel, Joseph Corozzo, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the defendant pled guilty, the Money Judgment in the amount of $61,800.97 in United States currency, representing the value of the Forfeitable Properly shall be entered against the defendant.

2. Pursuant to rule 32.2(b) (4) of the Federal Rules of criminal Procedure, this consent preliminary order of forfeiture/money judgment is final as to the defendant, shall be deemed part of the sentence of the defendant and will be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payment on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance to the "united states marshals service", and delivered by overnight mail to the united states attorney's office, southern district of New York, Attn: money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One st. Andrew's Palza. New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the defendant's name and case number.

4. The united States Marshals Services is authorized to deposit the payments on the money judgment in the Assets forfeiture fund, and the united states shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. pursuant to rule 32.2 (b) (3) of the federal rules of criminal procedure, the united states Attorney's office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including dispositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

7. The Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified copies of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment to Assistant United States Attorney Alexander J. Wilson, Co-Chief of the Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, United States Attorney's Office, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts,, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

AGREED AND CONSENTED TO:

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Guido

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 26, 2022
S7 20 Cr. 163 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Guido

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS GUIDO, III Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 26, 2022

Citations

S7 20 Cr. 163 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2022)