From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Groth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 29, 2015
15-CR-112 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2015)

Opinion

15-CR-112

07-29-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. WILLIAM GROTH, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

:

By memorandum and scheduling order, on June 26, 2015, the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss the superseding indictment and set the case for trial on October 5, 2015.

The parties were requested to brief the effect, if any, of Johnson v. United States, No. 13-1720, 2015 WL 2473450 (U.S. June 26, 2015).

The court has reviewed defendant's supplemental brief of July 20, 2015, and the government's letter of the same date. No oral argument is needed.

Denial of the motion to dismiss is reaffirmed. Johnson dealt with a test of criminality less precise than that in the Analogue Act. It does not control the instant case. The case shall be tried as scheduled.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Jack B. Weinstein

Senior United States District Judge
Date: July 29, 2015

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

United States v. Groth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 29, 2015
15-CR-112 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Groth

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. WILLIAM GROTH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 29, 2015

Citations

15-CR-112 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2015)