From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Grooms

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 1, 2015
613 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-7015

09-01-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RYAN KENNETH GROOMS, Defendant - Appellant.

Ryan Kenneth Grooms, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew J. Modica, Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00592-DCN-8) Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ryan Kenneth Grooms, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew J. Modica, Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ryan Kenneth Grooms appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Grooms, No. 2:09-cr-00592-DCN-8 (D.S.C. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Grooms

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 1, 2015
613 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Grooms

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RYAN KENNETH GROOMS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 1, 2015

Citations

613 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2015)