From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Grimaldo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 14, 2015
626 F. App'x 200 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-10221

12-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GREGORY ALAN GRIMALDO, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00355-GEB MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Gregory Alan Grimaldo appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Grimaldo's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Grimaldo has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

Grimaldo's pro se motion for bail pending appeal is DENIED as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Grimaldo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 14, 2015
626 F. App'x 200 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Grimaldo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GREGORY ALAN GRIMALDO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 14, 2015

Citations

626 F. App'x 200 (9th Cir. 2015)