From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Greybull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Oct 30, 2018
CR 18-20-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Oct. 30, 2018)

Opinion

CR 18-20-BLG-SPW-TJC

10-30-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER GREYBULL, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Defendant, by consent, appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and entered a plea of guilty to Counts I through V of the Indictment, which charges the crimes of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count I), possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count II), possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count III), possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (Count IV), and felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Count V).

After examining the Defendant under oath, the Court determined:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea to the criminal offenses charged against him;

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of pleading guilty to the charges;

3. That the Defendant fully understands his pertinent constitutional rights and the extent to which he is waiving those rights by pleading guilty to the criminal offenses charged against him; and

4. That his plea of guilty to the criminal offenses charged against him is knowingly and voluntarily entered, and is supported by independent factual grounds sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the offenses charged.

The Court further notes that Defendant entered the guilty plea without a written plea agreement and counsel represented that no more favorable plea agreement offers were made.

Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the charges in Counts I through V of the Indictment and that sentence be imposed.

Objections to these Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Findings and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Crim. P 59(b)(2).

DATED this 30th day of October, 2018.

/s/_________

TIMOTHY J. CAVAN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Greybull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Oct 30, 2018
CR 18-20-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Oct. 30, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Greybull

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER GREYBULL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2018

Citations

CR 18-20-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Oct. 30, 2018)