Opinion
Case Number 12-11400
01-25-2013
Honorable David M. Lawson
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT DECREE
On January 18, 2013, the plaintiff filed an unopposed motion to enter consent decree. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions and finds that the decree is fair, adequate, reasonable, consistent with the underlying statute (the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act), and consistent with the public interest. United States v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't, 591 F.3d 484, 489 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Akzo Coatings of America, Inc., 949 F.2d 1409, 1426 (6th Cir. 1991). The Court will therefore grant the unopposed motion for entry of the decree.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's unopposed motion for entry of consent decree [dkt. #16] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the proposed consent decree improperly filed by the plaintiff as an exhibit to its motion [ECF Doc. No. 16-1] is STRICKEN.
______________
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 25, 2013.
_____________
SHAWNTEL JACKSON