See, e.g., United States v. Stokes, 829 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2016) (no legitimate expectation of privacy in a rented P.O. Box); United States v. Hinton, 222 F.3d 664 (9th Cir. 2000) (no objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in a parcel locker that cannot be individually rented); United States v. Osunegbu, 822 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1987) (minimal expectation of privacy for private post office box because postal employees would have to look at and move the mail); United States v. Lewis, 738 F.2d 916 (8th Cir. 1984) (no legitimate expectation of privacy in an unlocked mailbox situated in a rural area that was accessible to the public because defendant had "every expectation that government officials would regularly open the box to deliver mail"); United States v. Green, No. CR 19-05-BLG-SPW-02, 2019 WL 1643661 (D. Mont. Apr. 16, 2019) (no expectation of privacy in residential mailbox where resident did not endeavor to make the mailbox private). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals does not appear to have addressed this issue; recently, a Pennsylvania court acknowledged that it was an issue of first impression, before adopting the majority view.