From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Green

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
No. 2:06-CR-257 WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:06-CR-257 WBS

08-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL STEVEN GREEN, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for PAUL S. GREEN BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney T. Zindel for M. Stegman MATTHEW STEGMAN Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

PAUL STEVEN GREEN

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Paul Steven Green, that the status conference scheduled for August 8, 2011, may be continued to September 12, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.

The United States Attorney has reassigned the case to A.U.S.A. Kyle Reardon on the departure of A.U.S.A. Matthew Stegman. Mr. Reardon and Mr. Stegman have both reviewed the resolution proposed by Mr. Green but Mr. Reardon needs additional time to consult with his supervisors. A decision is expected before the September 12 status conference. To afford the government time to complete its review, the parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, so that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on September 12, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for PAUL S. GREEN

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

T. Zindel for M. Stegman

MATTHEW STEGMAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to September 12, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. Time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded through that date for the reasons stated above and by agreement of the parties, the Court finding that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Green

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
No. 2:06-CR-257 WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Green

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL STEVEN GREEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

No. 2:06-CR-257 WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)