From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Green

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2012
473 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7735

05-24-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRENT MICHAEL GREEN, a/k/a Big Bruce, Defendant - Appellant.

Charles R. Brewer, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:03-cr-00016-FDW-4)

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Brewer, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brent Michael Green appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Green, No. 3:03-cr-00016-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Green

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2012
473 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Green

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRENT MICHAEL GREEN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

473 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2012)