From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gray

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 24, 1987
833 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-3085.

November 24, 1987.

G. Curtis Drake, Helena, Mont. for defendant-appellant.

Byron H. Dunbar, U.S. Atty., and Carl E. Rostad, Asst. U.S. Atty., Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before ANDERSON, HUG and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


By an order entered October 5, 1987, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 54, 98 L.Ed.2d 18, the United States Supreme Court vacated this court's decision reported at 809 F.2d 579 and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General's position stated in his brief filed June 17, 1987.

Upon reconsideration, this court's opinion filed February 3, 1987, is VACATED. The decision of the district court reported at 633 F. Supp. 1311 is VACATED and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to set aside the conviction and the jury verdict and to dismiss the Indictment.


Summaries of

United States v. Gray

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 24, 1987
833 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1987)
Case details for

United States v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JAMES EDWARD GRAY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 24, 1987

Citations

833 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Raymer

Excluding Raymer's case, § 115 appears to have been employed only three times. See United States v. Hohman,…