From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Grandstaff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01210-MJS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01210-MJS

07-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY A. GRANDSTAFF, Respondent.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Petitioner United States of America


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Petitioner United States of America

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT


CHANGE IN HEARING DATE

Upon the petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, including the declaration of Revenue Officer MICHAEL NICHOLAS, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the respondent, JEFFREY A. GRANDSTAFF, appear before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, in that Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, on Friday, September 14, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., and that respondent show cause as follows:

1. Why respondent, JEFFREY A. GRANDSTAFF, should not be held in civil contempt of this Court for his failure to comply with the Order filed on October 14, 2011, directing respondent to comply with the I.R.S. Summons issued on July 21, 2011.

2. Why the respondent should not be incarcerated and ordered to pay a daily fine until he complies with the Order, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 14 calendar days after the filing of this Order, the respondent shall file and serve a written response to the Petition re: Civil Contempt of Order Filed October 14, 2012, Filed June 21, 2012. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive papers and supported by declaration will be considered at the hearing on this Order, and any uncontested allegation in the Petition Re: Civil Contempt will be considered admitted.

Respondent is hereby notified that a failure to comply with this Order will subject respondent to possible further sanctions for contempt of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Grandstaff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01210-MJS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Grandstaff

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY A. GRANDSTAFF, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 10, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01210-MJS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)