Opinion
22-6258
12-19-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OSCAR ANTONIO GRANDE, a/k/a Pantera, Defendant-Appellant.
Lana Manitta, LAW OFFICE OF LANA MANITTA, PLLC, Purcellville, Virginia, for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Joseph Attias, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: December 15, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cr-00283-RDA-2)
ON BRIEF:
Lana Manitta, LAW OFFICE OF LANA MANITTA, PLLC, Purcellville, Virginia, for Appellant.
Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Joseph Attias, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Oscar Antonio Grande appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Grande's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Grande, No. 1:04-cr-00283-RDA-2 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 8, 2022 &entered Feb. 10, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED