From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTICT COUT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2011
Case No.: 2:11-cr-00045-GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-cr-00045-GEB

08-04-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN GRAHAM, Defendant

Robert J. Saria SBN: 128749 SARIA & SARIA Attorney for Defendant Justin Graham


Robert J. Saria

SBN: 128749

SARIA & SARIA

Attorney for Defendant Justin Graham

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff, by its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Matthew G. Morris and the defendant Justin Graham, by his counsel, Robert J. Saria, hereby stipulate and agree that the current status conference should be vacated and that the status conference be rescheduled for September 9, 2011 at 9:00 am. The additional time is needed to consider the government's offer in this case and for the defense to provide information to the government.

The parties further agree that time should be excluded through September 9, 2011 pursuant to Local Rule of Court T-4 in order to allow the defendant time to prepare for trial and to conduct discussions with the government regarding possible resolution.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Robert J. Saria

Telephonically authorized to sign for

Matthew G. Morris

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

ROBERT J. SARIA

Counsel for Justin Graham

ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTICT COUT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2011
Case No.: 2:11-cr-00045-GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN GRAHAM, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTICT COUT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-cr-00045-GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)