From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Graham

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jan 25, 2007
CR 06-0725 SI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2007)

Opinion

          GAIL SHIFMAN Shifman Group, Attorneys, San Francisco, CA.

          JOSEPH ZESZOTARSKI, JR. Poyner & Spruill Raleigh, NC, Attorneys for Defendant. TREVOR GRAHAM


          [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS HEARING

          SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

         Defendant, TREVOR GRAHAM, by and through his attorneys, Gail Shifman and Joseph Zeszotarski, Jr., files this request to continue the status hearing currently scheduled before the Court on January 26, 2007, until February 2, 2007 at 11:00 a.m., for the reason that defense counsel is ill. Undersigned counsel has been advised by the government that they have no objection to this continuance and agree to the setting of the status hearing on February 2, 2007.

         ORDER

         The Court being advised and there being no objection, IT IS ORDERED that the status hearing is vacated on January 26, 2007 and continued until February 2, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. Dated: January _____, 2007.


Summaries of

United States v. Graham

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jan 25, 2007
CR 06-0725 SI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2007)
Case details for

United States v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TREVOR GRAHAM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jan 25, 2007

Citations

CR 06-0725 SI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2007)