From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gorsline

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Nov 19, 2019
No. 18-3708 (8th Cir. Nov. 19, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-3708

11-19-2019

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Nicole Marie Gorsline Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

While on supervised release for her role in a conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, Nicole Gorsline was arrested for forgery. After her probation officer testified about the arrest, the district court revoked supervised release. We affirm.

The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

On appeal, Gorsline argues that the district court should not have relied on her probation officer's testimony. Her theory is that, once he read from the police report of her forgery arrest, it gave rise to a "limited due process right[]" to confront the report's author. United States v. Johnson, 710 F.3d 784, 786 (8th Cir. 2013); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(2)(C).

The problem with Gorsline's theory is that she did not invoke this right at the revocation hearing. See United States v. Simms, 757 F.3d 728, 733 (8th Cir. 2014) (holding that there is no requirement for a district court to remedy a potential confrontation violation sua sponte at a revocation hearing). To be sure, Gorsline's attorney stated that the probation officer's testimony was "hearsay" and lacked "foundation." But there was no request to question the officer who wrote the report. See Johnson, 710 F.3d at 788 (holding that a releasee properly raised confrontation by "object[ing] to a separate constitutional violation of [his] right to cross-examine an adverse witness"). Having never made the request, Gorsline cannot now complain that she was denied the right to confront the report's author. See Simms, 757 F.3d at 733.

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.


Summaries of

United States v. Gorsline

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Nov 19, 2019
No. 18-3708 (8th Cir. Nov. 19, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Gorsline

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Nicole Marie Gorsline…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 2019

Citations

No. 18-3708 (8th Cir. Nov. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

State v. Theisen

United States v. Burrage, 951 F.3d 913, 916 (8th Cir. 2020) (defendant's failure to "clearly object based on…