From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez-Valencia

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 28, 2023
60 F.4th 1232 (9th Cir. 2023)

Opinion

No. 19-30222

02-28-2023

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose Antonio GONZALEZ-VALENCIA, aka Jose Antonio Valencia Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellee.

Richard C. Burson (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; William D. Hyslop, United States Attorney; Office of the United States Attorney; Yakima, Washington; for Plaintiff-Appellant. Paul E. Shelton (argued), Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington and Idaho, Yakima, Washington, for Defendant-Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Stanley A, Bastian, Chief District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-02044-SAB-1 Richard C. Burson (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; William D. Hyslop, United States Attorney; Office of the United States Attorney; Yakima, Washington; for Plaintiff-Appellant. Paul E. Shelton (argued), Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington and Idaho, Yakima, Washington, for Defendant-Appellee. Before: Danny J. Boggs, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges.

The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER

In light of the intervening en banc decision in United States v. Bastide-Hernandez, 39 F.4th 1187 (9th Cir. 2022) (en banc), cert. denied, No. 22-6281, — U.S. —, 143 S.Ct. 755, — L.Ed.2d — (U.S. Jan. 23, 2023), we vacate our opinion in United States v. Gonzalez-Valencia, 3 F.4th 1208 (9th Cir. 2021), reverse the district court's dismissal of the indictment, and remand for proceedings consistent with Bastide-Hernandez.

With this order, the panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge M. Smith and Judge Bennett vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Boggs so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed August 3, 2021, is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

REVERSED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez-Valencia

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 28, 2023
60 F.4th 1232 (9th Cir. 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez-Valencia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose Antonio…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

60 F.4th 1232 (9th Cir. 2023)