From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez-Mendoza

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 19, 2005
144 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted December 6, 2004.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

David A. Kettel, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James H. Locklin, FPD, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00530-JSL.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER and MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The petition for panel rehearing is granted. The Memorandum Disposition filed December 10, 2004, is WITHDRAWN and replaced with the following Memorandum Disposition:

Celestino Gonzalez-Mendoza appeals his conviction and 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Mendoza has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Gonzalez-Mendoza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. Because the Sentencing Guidelines are now advisory, we remand so the district court can determine if Gonzalez-Mendoza should receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines system. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, ---- - ----, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-67, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); United States v. Hermoso-Garcia, 413 F.3d 1085, 1089-90 (9th Cir.2005).

Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal is DENIED.

The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the sentence is REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez-Mendoza

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 19, 2005
144 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez-Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Celestino…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

144 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2005)