From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez-Borquez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2019
No. 18-10101 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-10101

08-22-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESUS ALFREDO GONZALEZ-BORQUEZ, AKA Jesus Alfredo Gonzalez-Borquz, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00789-SMM-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jesus Alfredo Gonzalez-Borquez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzalez-Borquez first contends that the district court procedurally erred in imposing his sentence. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. Contrary to Gonzalez-Borquez's contentions, the record indicates that the district court made an individualized sentencing determination and addressed Gonzalez-Borquez's arguments for a downward variance. Furthermore, Gonzalez-Borquez has not shown that his sentence was based on unsupported assumptions or erroneous facts in violation of his substantial rights. See United States v. Christensen, 732 F.3d 1094, 1106 (9th Cir. 2013).

Gonzalez-Borquez also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. We conclude that the court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and did not abuse its discretion in giving greater weight to the need for deterrence and protection of the public. See United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) ("The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district court"). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Gonzalez-Borquez's criminal history. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez-Borquez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2019
No. 18-10101 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez-Borquez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESUS ALFREDO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

No. 18-10101 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019)