From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez-Almanzar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 24, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cr-00389 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cr-00389 EJG

08-24-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MAXIMIANO GONZALEZ-ALMANZAR, Defendant.

BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant United States Attorney ERIN J. RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant MAXIMIANO GONZALEZ-ALMANZAR


ERIN J. RADEKIN

Attorney at Law - SBN 214964

Attorney for Defendant

MAXIMIANO GONZALEZ-ALMANZAR

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE


STIPULATION

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Heiko P. Coppola, and defendant Maximiano Gonzalez-Almanzar, by and through his counsel, Erin J. Radekin, agree and stipulate to vacate the date set for status conference in the above-captioned matter, August 26, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. and to continue the status conference to September 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., in the courtroom of the Honorable Edward J. Garcia.

On August 17, 2011, Mr. Coppola provided Ms. Radekin with a written plea agreement; however, Ms. Radekin needs more time to visit Mr. Gonzalez-Almanzar to go over the plea agreement with him. Mr. Gonzalez-Almanzar is currently housed at the Butte County Jail in Oroville, California. In order to visit Mr. Gonzalez-Almanzar, it is necessary that Ms. Radekin coordinate a date and time that both she and a Spanish interpreter can travel to Oroville. Such visit requires that Ms. Radekin have a half-day free in her calendar and that she find a Spanish interpreter who can travel to the Butte County Jail and remain during that same half-day period. Due to the logistical problems involved in visiting Mr. Gonzalez-Almanzar, Ms. Radekin has not been able to visit Mr. Gonzalez-Almanzar to go over the plea agreement with him, nor was she able to arrange such a visit prior to the August 26, 2011 court date. Ms. Radekin has discussed this matter with Mr. Coppola, and he has no objection to a continuance for this purpose. Further, he has authorized Ms. Radekin to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

The parties further agree and stipulate that the time period from the filing of this stipulation until September 9, 2011 should be excluded in computing time for commencement of trial under the Speedy Trial Act, based upon the interest of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective defense preparation. It is further agreed and stipulated that the ends of justice served in granting the request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant United States Attorney

ERIN J. RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant

MAXIMIANO GONZALEZ-ALMANZAR

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying stipulation and declaration of counsel, the status conference of August 26, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and the above-captioned matter is set for status conference on September 9. 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in the courtroom of the Honorable Edward J. Garcia. The court finds excludable time in this matter through September 9, 2011 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective defense preparation. For the reasons stipulated by the parties, the Court finds that the interest of justice served by granting the request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Edward J. Garcia

U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez-Almanzar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 24, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cr-00389 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez-Almanzar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MAXIMIANO GONZALEZ-ALMANZAR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cr-00389 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)