From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 22, 2021
20-3490-cr (2d Cir. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

20-3490-cr

12-22-2021

UNITED STATES OF-AMERICA, Appellee, JOSELITO RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, Defendant Appellant.

FOR APPELLEE: Tiffany H. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, for James P. Kennedy, Jr., United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Buffalo, NY. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: David R. Morabito, East Rochester, NY.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

SEALED SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1, WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PATTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 22nd day of December, two thousand twenty-one.

Appeal from a judgment, entered September 22, 2020, by the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., then-Chief Judge).

FOR APPELLEE: Tiffany H. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, for James P. Kennedy, Jr., United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Buffalo, NY.

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: David R. Morabito, East Rochester, NY.

PRESENT: JOSE A. Cabranes, Barrtington D. Parker, Eunicu C. Lee, Circuit Judges.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the September 22, 2020 judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Defendant Joselito Rodriguez Gonzalez appeals the District Court's judgment principally sentencing him to a 72-month term of imprisonment and four years of supervised release. On March 26, 2019, Gonzalez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and (XXXXX).

On July 23, 2020, after Gonzalez had pleaded guilty, he was arrested by the Livingston County Sheriffs Office for allegedly selling cocaine on three occasions: July 18, July 20, and July 23, 2020. (XXXXX) We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

Where, as here, a plea agreement "is conditioned on satisfaction of the obligor, the condition is not met 'if the obligor is honestly, even though unreasonably, dissatisfied."' United States v. Rexach, 896 F.2d 710, 713 (2d Cir. 1990) (citing Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 228, cmt. (XXXXX)

(XXXXX) “ The charges filed against [Gonzalez] provided a good faith basis for the Government to determine that he had breached his obligation not to commit any (XXXXX) Accordingly, and after reviewing the record before us, we find nothing to support Gonzalez's allegation of bad faith on the part of the Government.

We have considered all of Gonzalez's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, therefore, we AFFIRM the September 22, 2020 judgment of the District Court.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 22, 2021
20-3490-cr (2d Cir. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF-AMERICA, Appellee, JOSELITO RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, Defendant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

20-3490-cr (2d Cir. Dec. 22, 2021)