Opinion
No. 19-30017
08-23-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RANDALL GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00051-TOR-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Randall Gonzalez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 87-month concurrent sentences for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and being a felon and domestic violence misdemeanant in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (9). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.