From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gomez-Martinez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
No. 15-10288 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-10288

08-03-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALFREDO GOMEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00868-RCC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Alfredo Gomez-Martinez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Martinez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Gomez-Martinez has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. All other pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Gomez-Martinez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
No. 15-10288 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Gomez-Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALFREDO GOMEZ-MARTINEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 3, 2016

Citations

No. 15-10288 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)