From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gomez-Arriaga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 8, 2013
CASE NO. 12CR5000-BTM (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CR5000-BTM

02-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO GOMEZ-ARRIAGA, Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

(Rule 48, F.R.Crim.P.)

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that: __ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; __ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal without prejudice; or __ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or __ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or __ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty; X of the offense(s) of: 21 USC 952 and 960.

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged pursuant to Rule 48, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

________________________

RUBEN B. BROOKS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ENTERED ON _____________


Summaries of

United States v. Gomez-Arriaga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 8, 2013
CASE NO. 12CR5000-BTM (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Gomez-Arriaga

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO GOMEZ-ARRIAGA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 12CR5000-BTM (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)