Opinion
Case No. 17-CR-113(20)
05-01-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Luis F. Gomez et al, Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S CHANGE OF PLEA
The United States of America and the defendant, Maricela Dominguez, appeared before me on May 1, 2019, for a change of plea colloquy pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Court Minutes for Change of Plea Hearing, ECF No. 445. Ms. Dominguez, who was represented by counsel at the hearing, consented to my conducting the plea colloquy. I explained that it would be for United States District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller alone, not me, to enter the plea and that my role was to conduct the plea colloquy and then to prepare a report and recommendation for ultimate disposition by Judge Stadtmueller.
After Ms. Dominguez was placed under oath and advised as to the implications of being untruthful, I questioned her about her competency to go forward with the hearing. Through her responses, I found that Ms. Dominguez was lucid, intelligent, and not under the influence of any intoxicants or substances.
I then discussed in detail each of the subjects specified in Rule 11, including the rights Ms. Dominguez would surrender by entering a plea of guilty, the maximum penalties associated with the offenses included in the Plea Agreement, ECF No. 418, and the authority of the sentencing judge to sentence Ms. Dominguez at the statutory maximums. Ms. Dominguez fully understood the rights she was surrendering and the implications of pleading guilty. Ms. Dominguez also was satisfied that she had received effective assistance of counsel.
At the conclusion of this colloquy, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and was not induced by any threats or promises. I found that there was an independent factual basis containing each of the essential elements of Count 1 charged in the Information, ECF No. 416, to which Ms. Dominguez was pleading guilty. Ms. Dominguez advised that she was pleading guilty to that offense because she was, in fact, guilty and that the United States could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty of it. Finally, I found that, in responding to my questions, Ms. Dominquez was candid, respectful, and non-evasive, fully accepting responsibility for and acknowledging the unlawfulness of her conduct.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Maricela Dominguez's plea of guilty be accepted; that she be found to have accepted responsibility for her crime; that a presentence investigation and report be prepared according to the schedule set by the Court; and that Ms. Dominguez be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
Your attention is directed to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b), and E.D. Wis. Gen. L. R. 72(c), whereby written objections to any recommendation herein, or part thereof, may be filed within fourteen days of service of this Recommendation. Objections are to be filed in accordance with the Eastern District of Wisconsin's electronic case filing procedures. Failure to file a timely objection with Judge Stadtmueller shall result in a waiver of your right to appeal. If no response or reply will be filed, please notify Judge Stadtmueller in writing.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 1st day of May, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ David E . Jones
DAVID E. JONES
United States Magistrate Judge