Opinion
No. 10-10270 D.C. No. 1:08-cr-00023-OWW
04-25-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARYL CURTIS GLENN, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Daryl Curtis Glenn appeals from his jury conviction and 180-month sentence for two counts of receipt or distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Glenn's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Glenn the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.