From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Givens

United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
Jun 23, 2022
Criminal Action 17-103 (E.D. La. Jun. 23, 2022)

Summary

explaining the court had “no power to modify” a term of imprisonment that was imposed by a different judge

Summary of this case from United States v. Knox

Opinion

Criminal Action 17-103

06-23-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DORIAN GIVENS OUISIANA CRIMINAL ACTION


SECTION: “E” (5)

ORDER

SUSIE MORGAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) filed by Defendant Dorian Givens. The Government has filed an opposition. Givens filed a reply.

R. Doc. 43. Such a motion is commonly referred to as a motion for compassionate release.

R. Doc. 45.

R. Doc. 53.

In September 2012, Given, along with others, was indicted on charges related to drug distribution in Criminal Action No. 12-259 in this Court. Givens later pleaded guilty to Counts 1, 12, and 13 and was sentenced to 57 months' imprisonment and a four-year term of supervised release. Givens was granted a sentence reduction to 46 months in light of guidelines applicable to his charges being reduced. Givens was released from prison in early 2016. Within several months, probation petitioned for Givens's arrest for violating his terms of supervised release and possessing a firearm. Givens had stopped reporting to his probation officer and failed to appear in state court on felon in possession of a firearm charges. In 2017, the Government adopted Givens's two pending state felon in possession of a firearm charges for federal prosecution, resulting in the present case, Criminal Action No. 17-103. On November 29, 2017, Givens pleaded guilty to both counts in this case. On March 19, 2018, Givens was sentenced to 30 months' imprisonment on two counts of felon in possession of a firearm, such terms to run concurrently.

USA v. Givens, No. 12-cr-259 (E.D. La.), R. Doc. 1.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 144.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 211.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 227.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 289.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 289.

R. Doc. 1.

R. Doc. 26.

R. Doc. 36.

After Givens pleaded guilty in this case, the Government filed a Rule to Revoke Supervised Release in Criminal Action No. 12-259. On May 2, 2018, Givens stipulated to the violations, and he was sentenced to a term of 36 months' imprisonment as to Count 1, 24 months' imprisonment as to Count 2, and 24 months' imprisonment as to Count 3, such terms to run consecutively. The sentence in Criminal Action No. 12-259 was to also run consecutively to the term of imprisonment in this case.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 289.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 293.

No. 12-cr-259, R. Doc. 294.

Id.

Givens's total term of imprisonment between the two cases is 114 months, consisting of 30 months in this case and 84 months in Criminal Action No. 12-259. Givens has served approximately 65 months. As the sentence in this case was only 30 months' imprisonment, it seems Givens has served his sentence of imprisonment in this case. By its terms, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1) applies only to a reduction of a term of imprisonment. As Givens has served his term of imprisonment in this case, there is nothing in this case to reduce under § 3582(c)(1). Givens's remaining term of imprisonment is in Criminal Action No. 12-259, which is assigned to a different judge of this Court and which the undersigned has no power to modify. “[T]he deliberate judicial acts of one judge are not open to review by another judge of the same court having co-ordinate jurisdiction.”

As of November 18, 2021, the Government estimated Givens had served about 58 months, which seems accurate. R. Doc. 45 at 3. According to the final presentence investigation report, Givens was arrested on January 16, 2017, by state officials, and he was transferred to federal custody on June 23, 2017. R. Doc. 29 at 3. It has been an additional seven months since November 2021, resulting in a total of 65 months.

Humphrey v. Bankers Mortg. Co. of Topeka, 79 F.2d 345, 352 (10th Cir. 1935); see also Herzfeld v. Parker, 543 F.Supp. 1019, 1021 (D. Colo. 1982).

Accordingly;

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) filed by Defendant Dorian Givens is DENIED AS MOOT.

R. Doc. 43.


Summaries of

United States v. Givens

United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
Jun 23, 2022
Criminal Action 17-103 (E.D. La. Jun. 23, 2022)

explaining the court had “no power to modify” a term of imprisonment that was imposed by a different judge

Summary of this case from United States v. Knox
Case details for

United States v. Givens

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DORIAN GIVENS OUISIANA CRIMINAL ACTION

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

Criminal Action 17-103 (E.D. La. Jun. 23, 2022)

Citing Cases

United States v. Knox

There is case law supporting this position. See United States v. Givens, 2022 WL 2262716, at *1 (E.D. La.…