From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gilmore

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 28, 2023
CRIMINAL 22-58 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2023)

Opinion

CRIMINAL 22-58

11-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES GILMORE, Defendant.


ORDER

Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge

For essentially the same reasons stated in the government's opposition (Doc. 55), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 52) based on Bruen and Range will be denied. As this Court repeatedly has observed, the ruling in Range was a narrow one. Range v. Att't Gen., 69 F.4th 96, 106 (3d Cir. 2023). In this case, Defendant's “as applied” challenge fails for multiple reasons.

First, because Defendant was an active state probationer. See U.S. v. William Lacell Dark, Jr., Criminal No. 21-413 at Doc. 88 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 24, 2023) (Bissoon, D.J., presiding) (citing U.S. v. Terry, 2023 WL 6049551 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 14, 2023) (Ranjan, D.J., presiding)).

Second, because Defendant's criminal history includes a conviction for drug trafficking -while at the same time unlawfully possessing a firearm. See Beaver Cnty. Ct. of Comm. Pls., Dkt. No. CP-04-CR-1693-2014. The drug trafficking conviction, alone, is fatal to Defendant's as-applied challenge. See U.S. v. Williams, 2023 WL 6810569, *7 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 2023) (Hardy, D.J., presiding). That he also unlawfully possessed a firearm in conjunction with the drug charge only “digs the hole” deeper. See U.S. v. Torrell Jones, Criminal No. 20-21 at Doc. 165 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2023) (Bissoon, D.J., presiding) (“the law has long recognized that drugs and guns are a dangerous combination”) (citations and internal quotations omitted).

Defendant's as-applied challenge fails on multiple grounds, each of which independently warrants a denial of his Motion. His facial challenge likewise fails, for the reasons stated in Torrell Jones. See id. (citing U.S. v. Hilliard, 2023 WL 6200066, at *1 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 21, 2023) (Ranjan, D.J., presiding); U.S. v. O'Connor, 2023 WL 5542087, *3 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2023) (Conti, D.J., presiding)).

For these reasons, and for the others stated in the government's opposition, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 52) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Gilmore

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 28, 2023
CRIMINAL 22-58 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Gilmore

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES GILMORE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 28, 2023

Citations

CRIMINAL 22-58 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2023)