United States v. Gillard

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILLIP GILLARD

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 24, 2024

CRIMINAL 23-cr-00026-2 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2024)

Opinion

CRIMINAL 23-cr-00026-2

01-24-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILLIP GILLARD

JOHN M. GALLGHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ORDER

JOHN M. GALLGHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 24^th day of January, 2024, after considering the following Motions filed by Defendant Phillip Gillard: (1) A Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence (ECF No. 163); (2) A Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 164); (3) A Motion for Speedy Trial (ECF No. 165); (4) A Motion for Severance Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 14(a) (ECF No. 166); (5) A Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Evidence (ECF No. 167); (6) A Motion to Suppress Photographs and Video Evidence from Pole Cameras with Memorandum of Law (ECF No. 168); (7) A Motion to Suppress Fruits of Search at 3006 Tulip Street and Memorandum of Law in Support (ECF No. 169); and (8) A Motion to Suppress Fruits of Search at 3006 Tulip Street and Memorandum of Law in Support (ECF No. 176); and after also considering: (1) the Government's Omnibus Response to Defendant's Pretrial Motions (ECF No. 184); (2) Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of his Motion to Suppress Cellphone Evidence (ECF No. 219); (3) the Government's Supplemental Response to Defendant's Pretrial Motions (ECF No. 220); and (4) the evidence and argument presented during the evidentiary hearing on Defendant's pretrial motions held on December 12, 2023; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

1. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence (ECF No. 163) is DENIED;

2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 164) is DENIED;

3. Defendant's Motion for Speedy Trial (ECF No. 165) is DENIED;

4. Defendant's Motion for Severance Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 14(a) (ECF No. 166) is DENIED;

5. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Evidence (ECF No. 167) is DENIED;

6. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Photographs and Video Evidence from Pole Cameras with Memorandum of Law (ECF No. 168) is DENIED;

7. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Fruits of Search at 3006 Tulip Street and Memorandum of Law in Support (ECF No. 169) is DENIED AS MOOT;

8. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Fruits of Search at 3006 Tulip Street and Memorandum of Law in Support (ECF No. 176) is DENIED; and

9. Defendant's Motion to Join in Co-Defendants' Pretrial Motions (ECF No. 176) is DENIED.