Opinion
22-7336
04-25-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAYMOND EDWARD GILL, Defendant-Appellant.
Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 20, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:86-cr-00231-GLR-1)
Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Raymond Edward Gill filed a notice of appeal in the underlying criminal action after filing multiple motions for a writ of error coram nobis. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Review of the district court docket confirms that the district court has not yet ruled on the pending motions. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED