From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Giles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2011
No. Cr.S. 09-397-JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. Cr.S. 09-397-JAM

08-04-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES RICHARD GILES, Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney SAMUEL WONG Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Bar #214897

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Defendant

JAMES RICHARD GILES

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE

Judge: John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, SAMUEL WONG, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff, and BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, that the status conference set for August 9, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., be rescheduled to September 20, 2011, at 9:30 a.m..

The parties are engaged in settlement discussions and are attempting to work out, if possible, an agreement on the applicable Sentencing Guidelines and a possible pretrial resolution of this case. Additional time is needed to complete that process and defense counsel will need additional time to explain the terms and consequences contained in any anticipated plea agreement to his client so that the client can intelligently decide how to proceed in this case.

The parties agree that: (1) time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this stipulation, August 4, 2011, through and including September 20, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for preparation of defense counsel, and Local Code T4; and (2) the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

SAMUEL WONG

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, August 4, 2011, through and including September 20, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. A new status conference date is hereby set for September 20, 2011, at 9:30 a.m..

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Giles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2011
No. Cr.S. 09-397-JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Giles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES RICHARD GILES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

No. Cr.S. 09-397-JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)