Opinion
7:21-cr-18 (WLS)
08-19-2021
UNITED STATES, v. ANTHONY GIDDENS, Defendant.
ORDER
W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE.
Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion for Continuance, filed August 17, 2021. (Doc. 22.) The Parties move to continue trial in this case, which is currently scheduled to begin in September 2021, so that the Parties can review discovery and work on a resolution. (Id. at 2.) For the reasons below, the Motion (id.) is GRANTED.
The Speedy Trial Act permits a district court to grant a continuance of trial so long as the court makes findings that the ends of justice served by ordering a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). Section 3161(h)(7)(B) provides several factors the Court must consider when granting a continuance. United States v. Ammar, 842 F.3d 1203, 1206 (11th Cir. 2016). Among those factors are the likelihood that the lack of a continuance will result in a miscarriage of justice and the likelihood that failure to grant a continuance would deprive the defendant continuity of counsel or reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B).
The Court finds that the failure to grant a continuance here would likely result in a miscarriage of justice and deprive defendant's counsel of reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). Notably, the Parties need additional time to review discovery and work on a resolution. (Id. at 2.)
Accordingly, the Parties' Joint Motion for Continuance (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. The case is CONTINUED to the Valdosta trial term beginning November 8, 2021, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The Court ORDERS that the time from the date of this Order to the conclusion of the November 2021 Trial Term is EXCLUDED FROM COMPUTATION under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
SO ORDERED.