From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Giang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 11, 2012
No. 11-CR-00037-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-CR-00037-JAM

07-11-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GIANG, Defendant.

JOHN BALAZS Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL GIANG BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOHN BALAZS, Bar No. 157287

Attorney At Law

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL GIANG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDE TIME


Date: August 7, 2012

Hon. John A. Mendez

The parties jointly request that the status conference in this case be continued from July 17, 2012 to August 7, 2012 at 9:45 a.m. They stipulate that the time between July 17, 2012 and August 7, 2012 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into the account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel needs additional time to review and analyze documents provided by the government, to consult with the defendant, and to finalize a plea agreement with the government. Moreover, defense counsel has oral argument in a Ninth Circuit appeal on July 17, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. For these reasons, the parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully submitted,

_______________

JOHN BALAZS

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL GIANG

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _____________

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Giang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 11, 2012
No. 11-CR-00037-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Giang

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GIANG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

No. 11-CR-00037-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2012)