From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Giang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. 11-CR-00037-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-CR-00037-JAM

01-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GIANG, Defendant.

JOHN BALAZS, Bar No. 157287 Attorney At Law Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL GIANG BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOHN BALAZS, Bar No. 157287

Attorney At Law

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL GIANG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDE TIME


Date: March 6, 2012

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Hon. John A. Mendez

The parties jointly request that the status conference in this case be continued from January 10, 2012 to March 6, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. They stipulate that the time between January 10, 2012 and March 6, 2012 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into the account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel needs additional time to review the discovery provided by the government, to discuss that discovery with the defendant, and to finalize a plea agreement with the government. Moreover, defense counsel has oral argument scheduled in San Francisco in the Ninth Circuit Court of Apeals on the date of the currently-scheduled status conference, January 10, 2012. For these reasons, the parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________

JOHN BALAZS

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL GIANG

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _________________________

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Giang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. 11-CR-00037-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Giang

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GIANG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. 11-CR-00037-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)