From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ghio

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2015
2:10-CR-0144 WBS, 2:10-CR-0238 WBS, 2:10-CR-0239 WBS, 2:11-CR-0038 WBS, 2:11-CR-0039 WBS, 2:11-CR-0090 WBS, 2:11-CR-0291 WBS, 2:11-CR-0292 WBS, 2:11-CR-0492 WBS, 2:11-CR-511 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)

Opinion

          ANNA TRYON PLETCHER, TAI S. MILDER, MAY LEE HEYE, KELSEY C. LINNETT, Trial Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, San Francisco, California.

          MICHAEL S. THORMAN, Counsel for Anthony Ghio, KRESTA NORA DALY, Counsel for Theodore B. Hutz, CHRISTOPHER H. WING, Counsel for John R. Vanzetti, DORON WEINBERG, Counsel for Richard W. Northcutt, RICHARD TAMOR, Counsel for Yama Marifat, DONALD H. HELLER, Counsel for Gregory L. Jackson, CARL M. FALLER, Counsel for Walter Daniel Olmstead, ISMAIL RAMSEY, Counsel for Robert Rose. WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA, Counsel for Kenneth A. Swanger JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN, Counsel for Wiley C. Chandler, THOMAS A. JOHNSON, Counsel for Anthony B. Joachim.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCES

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         The above-entitled casesare currently set for status hearings on September 14, 2015.

         The related case, United States v. Katakis, et al., Cr. No. 2:11-511 WBS, went to trial on February 4, 2014. Several of the above-named defendants testified at that trial. On March 11, 2014, a jury returned guilty verdicts against Andrew Katakis and Donald Parker for bid rigging and Katakis for obstruction of justice. The jury could not reach a verdict on the conspiracy to commit mail fraud count.

         Katakis moved for a judgment of acquittal on the obstruction count. The Court granted the motion on May 9, 2014. On June 6, 2014, the government filed a notice of appeal. Four days earlier, on June 2, Katakis had moved for a new trial on the bid-rigging count. Parker joined that motion. On June 10, 2014, the Court stayed all proceedings pending receipt of an order of remand from the Court of Appeals. On August 31, 2015, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court's order granting Katakis a judgment of acquittal.

         The outstanding motions for a new trial remain to be resolved. If those motions are granted, the co-conspirators in the above-named cases may be called as trial witnesses. The government will not be able to fully determine its sentencing recommendation for defendants Ghio, Hutz, Vanzetti, Northcutt, Marifat, Jackson, Olmstead, Rose, Swanger, Chandler, and Joachim until after all trials in the related cases have been completed.

         Therefore, per agreement with defense counsel, it is respectfully requested that the existing status conference be continued to January 11, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. The United States Probation Office is in accord with this approach. It is anticipated that at that time, the parties will be in a better position to request dates for judgment and sentencing and disclosure schedules for presentence reports.

          ORDER

         For the reasons stated above, the Court continues the status conference for defendants Anthony B. Ghio, Theodore B. Hutz, John R. Vanzetti, Richard W. Northcutt, Yama Marifat, Gregory L. Jackson, Walter Daniel Olmstead, Robert Rose, Kenneth A. Swanger, Wiley C. Chandler, and Anthony B. Joachim from September 14, 2015 to January 11, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ghio

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2015
2:10-CR-0144 WBS, 2:10-CR-0238 WBS, 2:10-CR-0239 WBS, 2:11-CR-0038 WBS, 2:11-CR-0039 WBS, 2:11-CR-0090 WBS, 2:11-CR-0291 WBS, 2:11-CR-0292 WBS, 2:11-CR-0492 WBS, 2:11-CR-511 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Ghio

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY B. GHIO, Defendant. UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 3, 2015

Citations

2:10-CR-0144 WBS, 2:10-CR-0238 WBS, 2:10-CR-0239 WBS, 2:11-CR-0038 WBS, 2:11-CR-0039 WBS, 2:11-CR-0090 WBS, 2:11-CR-0291 WBS, 2:11-CR-0292 WBS, 2:11-CR-0492 WBS, 2:11-CR-511 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)