From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gerding

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Sep 5, 2019
No. 18-5227 (6th Cir. Sep. 5, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-5227

09-05-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KEVIN GERDING, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 19a0468n.06 ORDER Before: MERRITT, DAUGHTREY, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

The United States filed this appeal challenging defendant Kevin Gerding's sentence. In light of United States v. Stitt, 139 S. Ct. 399 (Dec. 10, 2018), and United States v. Quarles, 139 S. Ct. 1872 (June 10, 2019), as well as intervening cases from our court, we vacate defendant's sentence and remand this case to the district court for resentencing. Defendant's motion for a continuance of oral argument is denied as moot.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

/s/_________

Deborah L. Hunt, Clerk


Summaries of

United States v. Gerding

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Sep 5, 2019
No. 18-5227 (6th Cir. Sep. 5, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Gerding

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KEVIN GERDING…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 5, 2019

Citations

No. 18-5227 (6th Cir. Sep. 5, 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jenkins

This is what we have done in other cases raising the same issue on direct and collateral review after Stitt…