United States v. George

Full title: UNITED STATES v. CHRISTIN GEORGE

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Sep 2, 2021

2:21-mj-01220-ARM (D.N.J. Sep. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-mj-01220-ARM

09-02-2021

UNITED STATES v. CHRISTIN GEORGE

Honorable Anthony R. Mautone United States Magistrate Judge.

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Anthony R. Mautone United States Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b)(2) and Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds: [X] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[X] That the Proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

1. COVID pandemic,

2. Inability to conduct in-person hearing for indefinite period and

3. Consent of defendant.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[X] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] II Other: