United States v. Gentry

Full title: UNITED STATES v. HAKEEM GENTRY

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

CRIM. 21cr537(PGS) (D.N.J. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

CRIM. 21cr537(PGS) 19cr78(CCC)

07-15-2021

UNITED STATES v. HAKEEM GENTRY

Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other: