Opinion
2:22-CR-0069-GMN-DJA
01-16-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM GAVIRA, Defendant.
PITARO & FUMO, CHTD. Michael J. Miceli, Esq. MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT WILLIAM GAVIRA JASON M FRIERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Kimberly Anne Sokolich Esq . KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, ESQ. ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
PITARO & FUMO, CHTD.
Michael J. Miceli, Esq.
MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ.
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
WILLIAM GAVIRA
JASON M FRIERSON
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Kimberly Anne Sokolich Esq .
KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, ESQ.
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between WILLIAM GAVIRA, Defendant, by and through his counsel MICHAEL J MICELI, ESQ, and KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for January 17, 2023, 2022 at the hour of 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued for sixty (60) days or to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court.
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. Counsel has spoken to defendant and he has no objection to this continuance.
2. Counsel need additional time to prepare for sentencing with his client.
3. Counsel has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Sokolich and she has no opposition to the continuance.
4. Counsel Miceil begins a jury trial in State of Nevada v Edward Perez and will need additional time to prepare for sentencing with defendant.
5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.
6. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing date.
7. This is the second request for a continuance of the sentencing date in this case.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. Counsel has spoken to defendant and he has no objection to this continuance.
2. Counsel need additional time to prepare for sentencing with his client.
3. Counsel has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Sokolich and she has no opposition to the continuance.
4. Counsel Miceil begins a jury trial in State of Nevada v Edward Perez and will need additional time to prepare for sentencing with defendant.
5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.
6. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing date.
7. This is the second request for a continuance of the sentencing date in this case.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that SENTENCING currently scheduled for January 17, 2023 at the hour of 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to this 21st day of March, 2023, at the hour of 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7D .