From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gavira

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 28, 2022
2:22-CR-0069-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CR-0069-GMN-DJA

11-28-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM GAVIRA, Defendant.

PITARO & FUMO, CHTD. MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT WILLIAM GAVIRA JASON M FRIERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, ESQ. ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS


PITARO & FUMO, CHTD.

MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ.

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

WILLIAM GAVIRA

JASON M FRIERSON

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, ESQ.

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

(FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between WILLIAM GAVIRA, Defendant, by and through his counsel MICHAEL J MICELI, ESQ, and KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for December 13, 2022 at the hour of 2:00 p.m., be vacated and continued for thirty (30) days or to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel has spoken to defendant and he has no objection to this continuance.

2. Counsels need additional time to prepare for sentencing with his client.

3. Counsels has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Sokolich and she has no opposition to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing date.

6. This is the first request for a continuance of the sentencing date in this case.

2:22-CR-0069-RFB-DJA

(FIRST REQUEST)

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel has spoken to defendant and he has no objection to this continuance.

2. Counsels need additional time to prepare for sentencing with his client.

3. Counsels has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Sokolich and she has no opposition to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing date.

6. This is the first request for a continuance of the sentencing date in this case.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that SENTENCING currently scheduled for December 13, 2022 at the hour of 2:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to this 17th day of January, 2023, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7D.


Summaries of

United States v. Gavira

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 28, 2022
2:22-CR-0069-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Gavira

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM GAVIRA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

2:22-CR-0069-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)