From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gamboa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Jan 22, 2021
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:10-00111-09 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 22, 2021)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:10-00111-09

01-22-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOISES GAMBOA


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Moises Gamboa's pro se letter for release (ECF No. 801). Gamboa argues that a reduction in sentence is warranted for two reasons. First, Defendant points to the spread of the novel coronavirus in prisons. Second, Defendant argues that his sentence of 200 months of incarceration is excessive under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

While the Court is sympathetic to Defendant's concerns regarding the coronavirus and looks favorably on his rehabilitative efforts, he has not demonstrated extraordinary and compelling reasons for release. Defendant's medical records show that he does not have any preexisting conditions which place him at risk of severe complications if he contracts COVID-19. The mere possibility of contracting the illness is not a sufficiently "extraordinary and compelling" reason to justify a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). See, e.g., United States v. Feiling, No. 3:19cr112 (DJN), 2020 WL 1821457, at *7 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2020) (reasoning that "the fear of contracting a communicable disease proves insufficient to justify a sentence modification" (internal quotations omitted)). Additionally, the Court finds that 200 months incarceration (which reflects the Court's downward variance from the sentencing guidelines) is not excessive for the reasons stated at Gamboa's sentencing hearing. See ECF No. 721.

Finally, even if Defendant alleged extraordinary and compelling reasons for release, the Court has no authority to reduce Defendant's sentence where—as here—he has not demonstrated that he "has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion" or that thirty days have lapsed "from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility." See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).

The Court accordingly DENIES the Motion (ECF No. 801), and DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel and the defendant, the United States Attorney's Office, the United States Probation Office, and the United States Marshals Service.

ENTER: January 22, 2021

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Gamboa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Jan 22, 2021
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:10-00111-09 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 22, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Gamboa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOISES GAMBOA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 22, 2021

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:10-00111-09 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 22, 2021)