From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Galindo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 2, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cr-00215-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cr-00215-APG-BNW

10-02-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. ENRIQUE GALINDO, Defendant


Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Motion to Suppress

[ECF Nos. 22, 42]

Defendant Enrique Galindo filed a motion to suppress the firearm that police officers seized from him. ECF No. 22. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that the motion to suppress be denied. ECF No. 42. Mr. Galindo filed an objection to that recommendation and the Government responded by referring to its earlier opposition to the motion. I have conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress and related papers as required by Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Judge Weksler's Report and Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analyses and factual bases for the decision, and I adopt it as my own.

I HEREBY ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 42) is accepted. Mr. Galindo's motion to suppress (ECF No. 22) is denied.

Dated: October 2, 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Galindo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 2, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cr-00215-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Galindo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. ENRIQUE GALINDO, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 2, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cr-00215-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2020)