Opinion
21-CR-152 (JMA) (AYS)
03-08-2023
ORDER
JOAN M. AZRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Currently pending before the Court is Defendant's suppression motion, which the Court referred to Magistrate Judge Shields for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). On February 9, 2023, Judge Shields issued an R&R recommending that Defendant's motion be denied.
In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or . . . recommendations to which objection[s] [are] made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” Id. Those portions of a report and recommendation to which there is no specific reasoned objection are reviewed for clear error. See United States v. Robinson, No. 16-CR-545, 2018 WL 1009276, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2018).
To date, no objections have been filed to the R&R and the deadline for filing any such objections has passed. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c).
I have reviewed Judge Shields' R&R for clear error, and finding none, I adopt the R&R in its entirety as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant's motion to suppress is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.