Opinion
No. 19-6155
09-10-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEESHA ELAYNE FRYE, Defendant - Appellant.
Keesha Elayne Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Schaffer Knapp, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:17-cr-00115-WO-1) Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keesha Elayne Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Schaffer Knapp, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Keesha Elayne Frye appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice her motion challenging the amount of her monthly restitution payment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frye, No. 1:17-cr-00115-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2019). We deny Frye's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The dismissal order is final and appealable because the district court's grounds for dismissal indicate that no amendment to the motion could cure any of the defects identified in Frye's motion. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015). --------
AFFIRMED