From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Frisbey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
No. 2:09-CR-0513 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-CR-0513 MCE

10-27-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DALE R. FRISBEY, Defendants.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for DALE R. FRISBEY T. Zindel for M. Chastaine MICHAEL L. CHASTAINE Attorney for THOMAS G. COOPMAN T. Zindel for H. Gable HAYES H. GABLE, III Attorney for EDWIN B. TOOLE T. Zindel for R. Pachter RICHARD PACHTER Attorney for MONTGOMERY M. ATWATER BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney T. Zindel for S. Wong SAMUEL WONG Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

DALE R. FRISBEY

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: October 27, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between all defendants and plaintiff, United States of America, by and through their attorneys, that the hearing presently scheduled for October 27, 2011, may be continued to November 10, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

The Court has previously found this case to be complex under the Speedy Trial Act due to the time-span of the charges, the filing of a parallel forfeiture action, and numerous searches involved in the investigation. The parties' discussions regarding resolution of the case have continued since the last status conference and additional research has been done. Also, counsel for Mr. Frisbey just returned from six weeks of medical leave and needs additional time to meet with Mr. Frisbey. To allow time for counsel to prepare and to allow time for all parties to complete their review and negotiations, the parties agree that additional preparation time is needed and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this stipulation through November 10, 2011, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(ii), and (h)(7)(B)(iv)(Local Codes T2 and T4).

Respectfully Submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for DALE R. FRISBEY

T. Zindel for M. Chastaine

MICHAEL L. CHASTAINE

Attorney for THOMAS G. COOPMAN

T. Zindel for H. Gable

HAYES H. GABLE, III

Attorney for EDWIN B. TOOLE

T. Zindel for R. Pachter

RICHARD PACHTER

Attorney for MONTGOMERY M. ATWATER

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

T. Zindel for S. Wong

SAMUEL WONG

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The Court having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation in its entirety as its order. The status conference is continued to November 10, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. § 3161 and that the case is unusual and complex within the meaning of the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that a continuance is necessary for the reasons stated above and further finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court finds that the failure to grant the requested continuance would deny the defendant's counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Time is therefore excluded from the date of the parties' stipulation through and including November 10, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A),(h)(7)(b)(ii), and (h)(7)(B)(iv)(Local Codes T2 and T4).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Frisbey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
No. 2:09-CR-0513 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Frisbey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DALE R. FRISBEY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-CR-0513 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)