From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fregoso

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2013
1:12-CR-00040-002 LJO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2013)

Opinion

          David M. Porter Defendant’s Attorney


          ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

          Lawrence J. O’Neill, United States District Judge

         Upon motion of √ the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [ ] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

         IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

         [ ] DENIED. √ GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 54 months is reduced to 43 months. .

         (Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

         Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 9/6/2013 shall remain in effect.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Fregoso

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2013
1:12-CR-00040-002 LJO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Fregoso

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. LUIS JAVIER FREGOSO USM No. 17142-111

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Citations

1:12-CR-00040-002 LJO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2013)