From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Freeman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 19, 2012
474 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6162

06-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONTE CHERON FREEMAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Donte Cheron Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00016-JLK-1)

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donte Cheron Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donte Cheron Freeman appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Freeman, No. 4:06-cr-00016-JLK-1 (W.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012); see United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny Freeman's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Freeman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 19, 2012
474 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Freeman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONTE CHERON FREEMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hardy

Because Amendment 750 did not lower the statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment applicable to the…

United States v. Allen

Because Amendment 750 did not lower the statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment applicable to the…