From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Frazier

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 19, 2014
No. 13-15127 (11th Cir. Jun. 19, 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-15127 D.C. Docket No. 1:03-cr-00123-WS-M-1

06-19-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLIFTON LASHAWN FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH]


Non-Argument Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Clifton Lashawn Frazier in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Frazier has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgment revoking Frazier's supervised release and his resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Frazier

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 19, 2014
No. 13-15127 (11th Cir. Jun. 19, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Frazier

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLIFTON LASHAWN FRAZIER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 19, 2014

Citations

No. 13-15127 (11th Cir. Jun. 19, 2014)