From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Franklin

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Jul 2, 2019
No. 16-1580 (7th Cir. Jul. 2, 2019)

Opinion

No. 16-1580 No. 16-1872

07-02-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DENNIS M. FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANE SAHM, Defendant-Appellant.


NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin No. 3:14-CR-00128 James D. Peterson, Chief Judge. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin No. 3:15-CR-00110 James D. Peterson, Chief Judge.

ORDER

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has answered the question of state law that this court certified to it. United States v. Franklin, 928 N.W.2d 545 (Wis. 2019). Burglary under Wisconsin law, Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1m), applies to burglaries of vehicles as well as buildings and dwellings. That means the state crime is broader than the federal generic crime of burglary that may serve as a predicate for enhanced offenses under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). See Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) (Iowa burglary statute broader than federal generic burglary because it applies to burglaries of vehicles). In response to our request, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin has decided definitively that the state crime is not "divisible" among different locations for purposes of applying the Armed Career Criminal Act. As a result, the prior Wisconsin burglary convictions of defendants-appellants Dennis Franklin and Shane Sahm do not qualify as prior convictions for "violent felonies" to support their federal sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The parties have submitted statements of position under Circuit Rule 52. They and we agree on the next step. The federal sentences for both Franklin and Sahm in these appeals are hereby VACATED and their cases are REMANDED to the district court for resentencing without applying the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).


Summaries of

United States v. Franklin

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Jul 2, 2019
No. 16-1580 (7th Cir. Jul. 2, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Franklin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DENNIS M. FRANKLIN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Date published: Jul 2, 2019

Citations

No. 16-1580 (7th Cir. Jul. 2, 2019)

Citing Cases

Singleman v. United States

If sentenced today, these burglary convictions would not qualify as predicate offenses under Johnson v.…

Price v. United States

Petitioner Jason Price, a federal prisoner, filed a motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…