From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 13, 2020
CRIMINAL NO. 10-27-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 10-27-JWD-EWD

03-13-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD R. FRANK


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 173) dated February 27, 2020, to which objection was filed (Doc. 175);

IT IS ORDERED that that Petitioner's Motions to Vacate, Set Aside and Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (Docs. 154 & 160) are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for leave of Court Motion for "Stay" is DENIED as moot (Doc. 175). The Court also construes record document 175 as an objection to the report and recommendation (Doc. 173), and the objection is OVERRULED.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 13, 2020.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

United States v. Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 13, 2020
CRIMINAL NO. 10-27-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 13, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Frank

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD R. FRANK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 13, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 10-27-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 13, 2020)